tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13713642.post112334484316685037..comments2024-03-28T04:30:11.046-05:00Comments on Unlocked Wordhoard: Afterlife and object permanenceDr. Richard Scott Nokeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01348275071082514870noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13713642.post-1144102337306489792006-04-03T17:12:00.000-05:002006-04-03T17:12:00.000-05:00sorry didn't have time to finish what i said last ...sorry didn't have time to finish what i said last time.<BR/><BR/>my opinion is that object permanence is just a premature notion of conservation. in ontogeny, object permanence (or mommi permanence) of the infant evolves into the idea of conservation (of "amount") of the child and finally into the law of conservation that s/he learns in college physics. a parallel evolution in phylogeny is: "ancestor permanence" (as in ancestor cult, the precursor of religion) then evolves into "nothing comes from nothing, something always comes from something, and nothing disappears from something" philosophical insight (as seen in presocratics, daoism, etc.) and finally into the law of conservation in physics (from religion to philosophy to science: sort of Comtean but common sense too). see the diagram at the bottom of www.geocities.com/easternhistory/sacrifice.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13713642.post-1143860439620060782006-03-31T21:00:00.000-06:002006-03-31T21:00:00.000-06:00hey, i wrote a long theory on the origin of religi...hey, i wrote a long theory on the origin of religion based on this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com