Thursday, April 30, 2009
Why No Blogging?
Because I'm grading term papers and final exams. If I start blogging, I'll use it as procrastination, and won't get my grading done.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Beowulf Marathon ... er, Painful Sprint
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Morning Medieval Miscellany
In the Year of Our Lord, 2009:
- Ninalog has this image, and also a link to a story about a man attacking cops with a battleaxe.
- In the Middle announces the launching of postmedieval: a journal of medieval cultural studies. I'm trying to forgive the lower-case lettering, but it's difficult.
- Steven Till has an image from next year's Robin Hood movie.
- News for Medievalists has an update with three new articles.
- Papa's Secret Voodoo Boot has a post on, well, I guess the body.
- The Heroic Age also has an update, with several CfPs and the like.
- The Naked Philologist likes my students' Caedmon's Hymn project.
- Material Medieval Culture Blog has an update with a few new exhibitions.
- Though technically classical, The Lost Fort asks what Germans fought at Kalefeld.
- A Corner of Tenth-Century Europe gives you your coin fix.
TMR Review of Global Perspectives on Medieval English Literature, Language, and Culture
Here's a review by Richard F. Johnson of my book Global Perspectives on Medieval English Literature, Language, and Culture.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Morning Medieval Miscellany
For your consideration:
- Archaeology in Europe has an update with several new posts.
- Got Medieval has a post on the Ellesmere Chaucer portrait, and on on marginal monkeys.
- The Naked Philologist has a post on kingship in literature.
- News for Medievalists has an update with several new articles.
- Medieval Material Culture points us the the 2009 Washington Early Music Festival.
- Random Dafydd discusses the British Library and its online manuscript collection.
- Steven Tell tells us about Robert Curthose, Duke of Normandy.
Monday, April 20, 2009
The Herky-Jerky Politics of BBC's Robin Hood
Unfortunately, BBC's Robin Hood is only available through Season 2 in the United States, so I've not seen any subsequent episodes.
I was struck by the weirdness of the politics of the show, especially in the first season. While the second season settled into a bland, vaguely-left multicultural and semi-pacifist ideology, the first season was much more heavy-handed in its politics.
It wasn't weird that BBC had heavy-handed (indeed, often hamfisted) political content; the weird part is how inconsistent it is. It alternated wildly between Labour and Tory politics, rather than having a consistent pro-Labour political message like one expects from the BBC.
Take, for example, the episode "Turk Flu." You've got heroic striking English miners, oppressed cross-dressing Saracens, and all the trappings of a pro-Labour show. The Sheriff of Nottingham is depicted as an evil capitalist mine-owner, with a callous disregard for worker safety. Yes, the episode is one of the stupider ones, but it is what we expect the BBC to produce (er, the political content, not necessarily the stupidity).
On the other end of the spectrum though, is the pilot, "Will You Tolerate This?" In this episode, Robin is a former crusader (though haunted by the horrors of war) who returns to find his people suffering under excessive taxation. When Robin goes to the Council of Nobles meeting on Market Day and finds that there is no commerce because of the taxes, he suggests having a tax holiday every market day, and then offers a Cliff's Notes primer on basic capitalism as if he were channeling Adam Smith. Robin Hood is a tax-cutting capitalist Tory, and the Sheriff of Nottingham is depicted as a self-serving evil politician who pretends to have the people's best interests at heart with high taxes.
And so it goes, lurching back and forth from episode to episode. Sometimes the Sheriff is an evil right-winger, calling the fight against Robin Hood a "war on terror" and decrying the nanny state, and sometimes he's an evil left-winger, proclaiming the patriotic duty* of paying high taxes, and echoing socialist rhetoric that Robin Hood is stealing from us all.
I'm not sure what to make of the back-and-forth political play. At first, I thought it might be a case of dueling writers, each one trying to score political points through the scripts, but I've been unable to detect a pattern in terms of who gets the writing credit for each episode.
Perhaps it is simply that Robin Hood himself resists certain political interpretations. By his very nature, he is necessarily a populist figure, yet he fights the usurping Prince John in favor of the crusading King Richard. Robin Hood is not anti-authority; rather, he champions legitimate authority. Though in shorthand we often say Robin Hood "steals from the rich and gives to the poor," as we get past the bumper sticker version into full narrative we find that he steals from the (illegitimate) state and returns to the over-taxed poor what was already theirs. Ironically, for someone who is so often seen as a hero of wealth redistribution, Robin Hood is radically against the redistribution of wealth, and in fact distributes wealth back to those who originally produced it. Upon the return of King Richard, Robin Hood doesn't join a commune -- he re-takes his rightful place as feudal lord, master of his peasants. Robin Hood must flee to Sherwood Forest and take up arms because he is the rightful lord, fighting against the illegitimate authority of usurpers.
King Arthur is endlessly malleable in terms of his politics. He has been used as a symbol of both left and right, to good effect. Robin Hood, on the other hand, resists use as anything but a hero of the populist right. The further writers move away from that, the more their source material has to be stretched and twisted; it always risks popping back to its original shape.
*American audiences should note that the first season of Robin Hood preceded Joe Biden's claim that paying higher taxes is patriotic, so the similarity between Biden and the Sheriff is Biden's fault, not the writers of Robin Hood.
I was struck by the weirdness of the politics of the show, especially in the first season. While the second season settled into a bland, vaguely-left multicultural and semi-pacifist ideology, the first season was much more heavy-handed in its politics.
It wasn't weird that BBC had heavy-handed (indeed, often hamfisted) political content; the weird part is how inconsistent it is. It alternated wildly between Labour and Tory politics, rather than having a consistent pro-Labour political message like one expects from the BBC.
Take, for example, the episode "Turk Flu." You've got heroic striking English miners, oppressed cross-dressing Saracens, and all the trappings of a pro-Labour show. The Sheriff of Nottingham is depicted as an evil capitalist mine-owner, with a callous disregard for worker safety. Yes, the episode is one of the stupider ones, but it is what we expect the BBC to produce (er, the political content, not necessarily the stupidity).
On the other end of the spectrum though, is the pilot, "Will You Tolerate This?" In this episode, Robin is a former crusader (though haunted by the horrors of war) who returns to find his people suffering under excessive taxation. When Robin goes to the Council of Nobles meeting on Market Day and finds that there is no commerce because of the taxes, he suggests having a tax holiday every market day, and then offers a Cliff's Notes primer on basic capitalism as if he were channeling Adam Smith. Robin Hood is a tax-cutting capitalist Tory, and the Sheriff of Nottingham is depicted as a self-serving evil politician who pretends to have the people's best interests at heart with high taxes.
And so it goes, lurching back and forth from episode to episode. Sometimes the Sheriff is an evil right-winger, calling the fight against Robin Hood a "war on terror" and decrying the nanny state, and sometimes he's an evil left-winger, proclaiming the patriotic duty* of paying high taxes, and echoing socialist rhetoric that Robin Hood is stealing from us all.
I'm not sure what to make of the back-and-forth political play. At first, I thought it might be a case of dueling writers, each one trying to score political points through the scripts, but I've been unable to detect a pattern in terms of who gets the writing credit for each episode.
Perhaps it is simply that Robin Hood himself resists certain political interpretations. By his very nature, he is necessarily a populist figure, yet he fights the usurping Prince John in favor of the crusading King Richard. Robin Hood is not anti-authority; rather, he champions legitimate authority. Though in shorthand we often say Robin Hood "steals from the rich and gives to the poor," as we get past the bumper sticker version into full narrative we find that he steals from the (illegitimate) state and returns to the over-taxed poor what was already theirs. Ironically, for someone who is so often seen as a hero of wealth redistribution, Robin Hood is radically against the redistribution of wealth, and in fact distributes wealth back to those who originally produced it. Upon the return of King Richard, Robin Hood doesn't join a commune -- he re-takes his rightful place as feudal lord, master of his peasants. Robin Hood must flee to Sherwood Forest and take up arms because he is the rightful lord, fighting against the illegitimate authority of usurpers.
King Arthur is endlessly malleable in terms of his politics. He has been used as a symbol of both left and right, to good effect. Robin Hood, on the other hand, resists use as anything but a hero of the populist right. The further writers move away from that, the more their source material has to be stretched and twisted; it always risks popping back to its original shape.
*American audiences should note that the first season of Robin Hood preceded Joe Biden's claim that paying higher taxes is patriotic, so the similarity between Biden and the Sheriff is Biden's fault, not the writers of Robin Hood.
Nazis and Odinists Wanted
In its current incarnation, my work on the nationalist reaction to Beowulf: Prince of the Geats only has Nazis and Odinists represented through their e-mails of complaint to the filmmakers and the American Cancer Society, whereas the producers of the film were interviewed by telephone and in person. None of my e-mails to the various Nazis and Odinists have gotten any response.
I would really like to be able to interview some Nazis and Odinists, particularly if they have seen Beowulf: Prince of the Geats. Unfortunately, the Nazi who came to one of my public lectures left before I could get his contact information.
So, if you're a Nazi or an Odinist and would be willing to talk with me regarding Beowulf: Prince of the Geats in the next week or so, please send me an e-mail.
I would really like to be able to interview some Nazis and Odinists, particularly if they have seen Beowulf: Prince of the Geats. Unfortunately, the Nazi who came to one of my public lectures left before I could get his contact information.
So, if you're a Nazi or an Odinist and would be willing to talk with me regarding Beowulf: Prince of the Geats in the next week or so, please send me an e-mail.
Morning Medieval Miscellany
It's the last full week of classes here at Troy University, with all the accompanying insanity! I hope these links help you hold on to the frayed edges of your psyche.
- Peter Pormann of the University of Warwick has a series of audio podcasts on medieval Islam.
- Archaeology in Europe has an update with over a dozen new posts, many of them medieval.
- In the Feudal Transformation series, Jonathan Jarrett has "The Unbearable Emptiness of Being Post-Roman."
- Got Medieval discusses the medieval origins of Portugeuse Water Dogs.
- The Medieval Club of New York announces the lecture "Information by the Way: Townspeople and Cultural Networks in Later Medieval England" on May 1st.
- Medieval Material Culture Blog points us to a manuscript exhibition, and the Art of the Samurai.
- Modern Medieval links to a podcast of "Christianity and the Emperor between Diocletian and Constantine." Not strictly medieval, but there 'tis.
- Medieval News has an update with a few new items, including word that a medievalist, Hussein Anwar Fancy, has won a Carnegie Scholarship. Congratulations to Professor Fancy!
- Jennifer Lynn Jordan has a drawing of the Plantagenets.
- Getting Medieval has a post on the Canterbury Tales.
- Medieval Silkwork has all sorts of images of frilled veils.
Friday, April 17, 2009
Morning Medieval Miscellany
A few tidbits for you this Friday morning.
Acephalous asks for help on a medieval/Pan's Labyrinth question.
A Corner of Tenth-Century Europe tells us about Anselm Day at the Bodleian Library.
The Cranky Professor has a post about Giotto e il Trecento.
Henchminion has some comments about a marginal image on Got Medieval.
Magistra et Mater has a post about charters and Matilda of Flanders.
Want to go to grad school for medieval lit? You might want to read Papa's Secret Voodoo Boot's chronicle of the day in the life of a grad student in medieval lit.
A Stitch in Time has a post about a new book called Medieval Garments Reconstructed: Norse Clothing Patterns.
Studies of Popular Culture and the Middle Ages announces two new books: Cinematic Illuminations: The Middle Ages on Film (a great title), and Queer Movie Medievalisms.
Getting Medieval has a new poll.
Medieval Silkwork discusses some illustrations of a tool for winding yarn.
In the Middle plugs Levinas and Medieval Literature: The "Difficult Reading" of English and Rabbinic Texts.
Acephalous asks for help on a medieval/Pan's Labyrinth question.
A Corner of Tenth-Century Europe tells us about Anselm Day at the Bodleian Library.
The Cranky Professor has a post about Giotto e il Trecento.
Henchminion has some comments about a marginal image on Got Medieval.
Magistra et Mater has a post about charters and Matilda of Flanders.
Want to go to grad school for medieval lit? You might want to read Papa's Secret Voodoo Boot's chronicle of the day in the life of a grad student in medieval lit.
A Stitch in Time has a post about a new book called Medieval Garments Reconstructed: Norse Clothing Patterns.
Studies of Popular Culture and the Middle Ages announces two new books: Cinematic Illuminations: The Middle Ages on Film (a great title), and Queer Movie Medievalisms.
Getting Medieval has a new poll.
Medieval Silkwork discusses some illustrations of a tool for winding yarn.
In the Middle plugs Levinas and Medieval Literature: The "Difficult Reading" of English and Rabbinic Texts.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
More on the Distance Between Heaven and Hell
In an earlier post, I talked about the calculations one of my students had made about the distance between Heaven and Hell. Lingwe questions my student's assumptions, and Horseman, Pass By argues that the question is moot anyway because of a flawed reading of the text -- so maybe the question would be how far an angel would have to fall to be knocked unconscious for nine days?
Morning Medieval Miscellany
A happy Thor's Day morning to you!
- Wormtalk and Slugspeak has the text of that legendary play, "The Council of Elrond." Faithful enough to its source text for even the nitpickiest purist.
- Kate Laity discusses her essay on the Grendel opera.
- Steven Till has a review of The Traitor's Wife, as well as an interview with the author.
- Medievalism announces a summer graduate seminar on medievalism at Western Michigan.
- In the Middle discusses the new Canterbury Tales on NPR, as does Heavenfield.
- Homilaria has a post on Eusebius.
- Heroic Dreams chronicles trying to buy a real samurai sword.
- Heroic Age has a CfP on Getting Medieval on TV, as well as a set of links to news stories.
- Hammered Out Bits finds that Icelandic smelting furnaces might not have survived those cold winters very well.
- Coinciding with my discussion of the acephalous folks in The Travels of Sir John Mandeville, Got Medieval has folks with detachable heads!
- Speaking of acephalous folks, Acephalous has an image that anyone who watched MTV in the mid-90s will immediately recognize. Heh heh. Heh heh heh heh.
- Dame Eleanor Hull asks for feedback on Rob Pope's How to Study Chaucer.
- A Corner of Tenth-Century Europe discusses the various types of priests hanging about San Pere.
- Random Dafydd has a post with images of the Codex Manesse, as well as a video, which I've embedded below.
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Caedmon's Hymn (West Saxon Version)
AnSaxNet has had a lot of discussion of this video of Caedmon's Hymn. The singer is Clay Paramore, with the modern English translation by Erin Murray. Clay does not know any Old English, so Erin tutored him on pronunciation.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Least Cool Sword Fight of the Year
Sword fights are cool (in the modern world, anyway) -- but is there anything less cool than swordfighting someone thirty years your elder, and then accidentally killing a woman in her late 70s?
Way to go, dude. You just took one of the coolest things in the world and ruined it. After centuries of swordfighting moving away from its history of brutality and violence, and moving toward sport and historical recreation, you've knocked it back to being a tool of evil and stupidity again.
Way to go, dude. You just took one of the coolest things in the world and ruined it. After centuries of swordfighting moving away from its history of brutality and violence, and moving toward sport and historical recreation, you've knocked it back to being a tool of evil and stupidity again.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Dante's Inferno Balls
In New Orleans last week, my students bought me a box of cinnamon candies called "Dante's Inferno Balls."
I'm not sure where to take this joke: "They taste like Hell?" "I'll bet Beatrice never saw Dante's Inferno Balls?" "Perhaps he over-dosed on Viagra?" The mind boggles with possibilities!
I do have this one question, though: Is Dante's Inferno really such a marketable name? Is there a "Jean de Meun Florists" out there in the world somewhere? Or perhaps a "Peter Abelard athletic supporter?" Or a "Julian of Norwich Framery?"
So, to review: Odd product, lame jokes, mind boggling, more lame jokes.
Morning Medieval Miscellany
This this Monday morning:
- A Corner of Tenth Century Europe discusses a seminar on “The Cult of Edward the Martyr in the Reign of King Ćthelred ‘the Unready.’"
- Heavenfield has a post on Holy Week with St. Brendan.
- The Heroic Age has an update with ten new announcements of CfPs, new scholarly resources, etc.
- Quid Plura has a post on King WÅadysÅaw II JagieÅÅo, who was King of Poland & Grand Duke of Lithuania back in the days when the Poles and Liths had their joint medieval empire. It seems strange to me that somehow we've forgotten that empire in the modern era (in America, anyway). When you think "empire," do you think Poland or Lithuania?
- Michael Drout posts his 5th grade play, The Council of Elrond. I'm surprised he didn't get a cease & desist order from Christopher Tolkien's lawyers delivered to his elementary school.
- Dame Eleanor Hull has a Middle English word puzzle she is offering for people to use in their classes.
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Morning Medieval Miscellany
One of the joys of delayed posting is that I can do this MMM on Saturday night, without cutting into my Easter celebrations!
*Wasn't it a couple of years ago that ever-humble Berube quit blogging, claiming he had "taken the medium as far as it can go?" Apparently, he hadn't quite transcended the medium yet.
- Caught in the Snide takes issue with the word "stuffy" in the NYTimes review of Beowulf: A Thousand Years of Baggage.
- A Corner of Tenth Century Europe reviews an interdisciplinary seminar and argues that matriliny does not equal matriarchy.
- Hammered Out Bits has a post on Viking tents, and a video showing his forge.
- Heavenfield discusses an article on Urbs Iudeu.
- The Heroic Age has a list of links and registration for a colloquium at Swansea.
- Lingwe has video discussing Sigurd and Gudrun.
- The Medieval Garden Enclosed has a post on daffodils.
- Medieval Material Culture Blog has an update with several new exhibitions.
- Modern Medieval has the CfP for the Conference on Medievalism.
- Muhlberger comments on Berube's* post on Pullman, Lewis, and Tolkien.
- News for Medievalists has an update with several news stories.
- The Medieval Term of the Week is naifty, one I had never heard before.
- Studies of Popular Culture and the Middle Ages has and update with several upcoming films and TV shows.
- Medieval Silkwork is working on frilled veils.
*Wasn't it a couple of years ago that ever-humble Berube quit blogging, claiming he had "taken the medium as far as it can go?" Apparently, he hadn't quite transcended the medium yet.
Wednesday, April 08, 2009
Morning Medieval Miscellany
A quick MMM before heading off to Nawlins.
- Cranky Professor uncrankily discusses the layers in a 9th century mosaic.
- Eileen Joy reminds us of the "Glossing is Glorious" conference this weekend, as does Nic D'Alessio.
- Lingwe calls into question the math of my student calculating the Miltonian distance between Heaven and Hell.
- Magistra et Mater has a post on rationality and irrationality in medieval economics.
- News for Medievalists has updates on the medieval implications of the recent earthquake in Italy.
- Apparently, medieval Hungarians ritually sacrificed dogs. h/t Ninalog
- The final arrange for the K'zoo medieval bloggers meet-up are set.
- Quid Plura has an image of a little-known avatar of Thor.
- Steven Till has a post on Cerdic, first king of Wessex.
- Studies of Popular Culture and the Middle Ages has their mission statement, a list of relevant sessions at PCA/ACA this week, and a CfP for the International Congress on Medievalism.
Tuesday, April 07, 2009
Distance from Heaven to Hell
In Paradise Lost, Satan and the rebel angels fall for nine days through Chaos before landing in Hell. Today in class, I wondered aloud how far Heaven is from Hell, assuming standard rules of velocity.
Wes Cowan, one of my students, went to work on the question. Here's the answer:
Figures:
Terminal Velocity: 176 ft/sec
Seconds in a Day: 86,400 sec/day
Days in fall: 9 day/fall
Solution:
86,400 sec/day x 176 ft/sec = 15,206,400 ft/day
15,206,400 ft/day x 9 day/fall = 136,857,600 ft/fall
136,857,600 ft/fall / 5280 ft/mile = 25,920 mile/fall
So, there you go. Los Lonely Boys have their answer. Not really all that far, considering.
Wes Cowan, one of my students, went to work on the question. Here's the answer:
Figures:
Terminal Velocity: 176 ft/sec
Seconds in a Day: 86,400 sec/day
Days in fall: 9 day/fall
Solution:
86,400 sec/day x 176 ft/sec = 15,206,400 ft/day
15,206,400 ft/day x 9 day/fall = 136,857,600 ft/fall
136,857,600 ft/fall / 5280 ft/mile = 25,920 mile/fall
Notes:
- This math assumes that the terminal velocity of a falling angel is 176 ft/sec through a matrix of chaos. Being that chaos probably has no air or fluid to resist movement through drag or friction (since it is a void), terminal velocity would be the same as initial velocity.
- If we assume that chaos is indeed “a yawning void” the velocity of the fallen during their entire trip would be the same as their initial velocity. This leads to the troublesome question of, “How fast did God throw the fallen angels from heaven?” If the initial velocity of the fallen angels could be determined by discovering God’s level of wrath and strength of arm at the time the fallen angels were thrown, then the answer could be known.
- This answer also depends on whether or not God has chosen to allow the employment of Newtonian mechanics in regards to chaos and God’s ability to throw.
So, there you go. Los Lonely Boys have their answer. Not really all that far, considering.
Blogroll Update Ahead
After months of being out of commission, it seems that Blogrolling is working again. In that time, I've added a lot of blogs to my RSS feed, but haven't been able to add them to my blogroll.
If you've got a medieval-content blog and would like to see it added to my blogroll, please send me a link. Even if it's in my RSS feed (which you would know if you appear in the Miscellanies), I don't want anything slipping through the cracks.
Also, I'll be purging old, dead blogs. If you consider your blog active but haven't posted in many a month, it might be time to post again!
If you've got a medieval-content blog and would like to see it added to my blogroll, please send me a link. Even if it's in my RSS feed (which you would know if you appear in the Miscellanies), I don't want anything slipping through the cracks.
Also, I'll be purging old, dead blogs. If you consider your blog active but haven't posted in many a month, it might be time to post again!
Morning Medieval Miscellany
Ah, Dan Brown, you're probably hoping for another fat royalty check --
- According to the Vatican, the Knights Templar venerated and hid the Shroud of Turin for more than a century. h/t Muhlberger's Early History
- JJ Cohen has posted an early draft of "The Flow of Blood in Medieval Norwich."
- Hammered Out Bits has images from the Bridges and Doors exhibition ongoing in Providence.
- Got Medieval has a marginal image of ... well, you'll just have to go look at it.
Monday, April 06, 2009
Morning Medieval Miscellany
For your Monday morning:
- JJ Cohen asks for help in identifying a medieval Playmobil tableaux.
- Jonathan Jarrett has another mysterious image.
- On the more serious side, The Heroic Age has an update with lots of CfPs, lectures, and the like. For those interested, don't miss the new listserv for medieval medical history, MEDMED-L.
Sunday, April 05, 2009
PCA/ACA Roundup
You might not normally think "medieval" when you think of the Popular Culture Assocation / American Culture Association joint conference, but every year it has a strong showing in its Arthurian section and its medieval section.
I myself will be going, arriving Wednesday afternoon and leaving Friday evening. Who else plans to be there?
I myself will be going, arriving Wednesday afternoon and leaving Friday evening. Who else plans to be there?
Morning Medieval Miscellany
For your enjoyment on this Sunday morning:
Oh, and by the way, I've been watching the BBC Robin Hood all week, and I'm finding the ideology of the show curious. I may post on that later if I'm not too busy preparing for PCA.
- Medieval Material Culture Blog says that there's an archaeology exhibit in Freiburg through July 26th. As I don't read German, I'll take her word for it.
- The Medieval History Term of the Week is entry fine.
- Medieval Silkwork is working on a project "based on a ca. 1300 purse in the Sint Servaas treasury in Maastricht."
- News for Medievalists has an update with links to medieval headlines and new medieval articles online, including an announcement of a lecture entitled "How Medieval Nuns Invented the Postcard." That's absolutely ridiculous, of course. Everyone knows the postcard was invented by the Earl of Postcard, who didn't want to interrupt his card game to write a lengthy letter, so he popped of a few words on the back of the sketch of a sandwich. Or something like that.
Oh, and by the way, I've been watching the BBC Robin Hood all week, and I'm finding the ideology of the show curious. I may post on that later if I'm not too busy preparing for PCA.
Saturday, April 04, 2009
Morning Medieval Miscellany
... and back to our normally scheduled programming.
- Hammered Out Bits talks about a lecture that will take place today.
- Lingwe tells us that Verlyn Flieger will be speaking on “When is a Fairy-story a FaĆ«rie Story?” in Albuquerque Thursday night.
- Sumer Is Icumen In over at The Medieval Garden Enclosed.
- Speaking of spring, Quid Plura also has a post about April.
- Medieval Material Culture Blog has links to two exhibits.
- In what basically amounts to a collection of all my obsessions in one post, Podictionary has a post about the word impair and its history involving Boethius, Chaucer, King Alfred the Great, and JRR Tolkien.
- Steven Till is hosting a discussion of your favorite underrated fantasy or historical fiction novel.
- Here's a blog called Medieval Silkwork I had never heard of before. It doesn't post often, but has been around for a while. h/t A Stitch in Time
Friday, April 03, 2009
Morning Medieval Miscellanies -- Returning Soon!
My new computer has finally arrived, and now I can have more than one window open on the screen!
What does this mean for the Unlocked Wordhoard? Regular blogging should resume, particularly the Morning Medieval Miscellanies that so many had come to rely on.
My great thanks to Karma and Rivkah for stepping in and doing some Miscellanies while my technology was uncooperative.
What does this mean for the Unlocked Wordhoard? Regular blogging should resume, particularly the Morning Medieval Miscellanies that so many had come to rely on.
My great thanks to Karma and Rivkah for stepping in and doing some Miscellanies while my technology was uncooperative.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)